<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camden Crazies&#8217; Top 13 Orioles Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/</link>
	<description>The happenings of the Baltimore Orioles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:46:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camdencrazies.com/?p=851#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Yeah I could see people putting him that high, just want to see him at higher levels. You can definitely justify him being that high though, has potential to be a front of the rotation starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I could see people putting him that high, just want to see him at higher levels. You can definitely justify him being that high though, has potential to be a front of the rotation starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Moroz</title>
		<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Moroz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camdencrazies.com/?p=851#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Jordan. I saw enough out of Hobgood in his limited time (fine control, strong GB rate) that - combined with the scouting reports and his first-round pick status - I felt comfortable putting him that high on the list. Not unreasonable at all to rank him lower though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Jordan. I saw enough out of Hobgood in his limited time (fine control, strong GB rate) that &#8211; combined with the scouting reports and his first-round pick status &#8211; I felt comfortable putting him that high on the list. Not unreasonable at all to rank him lower though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camdencrazies.com/?p=851#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I like the list. Its fun comparing your list to mine http://www.oriolesprospects.com/OP/Top_20_Prospects.html

We are both very high on Britton, and have him as the number one prospect (I have Matusz first on mine but you dont include him). I dont think Hobgood should be that high but thats just my opinion. Love your opinion though, thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the list. Its fun comparing your list to mine <a href="http://www.oriolesprospects.com/OP/Top_20_Prospects.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.oriolesprospects.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.oriolesprospects.com/OP/Top_20_Prospects.html</a></p>
<p>We are both very high on Britton, and have him as the number one prospect (I have Matusz first on mine but you dont include him). I dont think Hobgood should be that high but thats just my opinion. Love your opinion though, thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Moroz</title>
		<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Moroz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camdencrazies.com/?p=851#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t give a lot of consideration to Welty for mostly the reasons you mentioned. The walks were good but not outstanding, and he did strike-out a lot considering he didn&#039;t hit for all that much power. I&#039;ve also hear - repeatedly - that his swing is funky; while some guys can certainly succeed that way (Hunter Pence, a guy Welty is sometimes compared to, for example), it&#039;s not exactly a plus.  For now I have doubts that he makes it passed Triple-A - and even if he did it&#039;s probably not that high a ceiling - but a good year next season could change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t give a lot of consideration to Welty for mostly the reasons you mentioned. The walks were good but not outstanding, and he did strike-out a lot considering he didn&#8217;t hit for all that much power. I&#8217;ve also hear &#8211; repeatedly &#8211; that his swing is funky; while some guys can certainly succeed that way (Hunter Pence, a guy Welty is sometimes compared to, for example), it&#8217;s not exactly a plus.  For now I have doubts that he makes it passed Triple-A &#8211; and even if he did it&#8217;s probably not that high a ceiling &#8211; but a good year next season could change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew @ TLC</title>
		<link>http://camdencrazies.com/2009/11/23/camden-crazies-top-13-orioles-prospects/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew @ TLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camdencrazies.com/?p=851#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just interested in your thoughts (or lack thereof) of Ronnie Welty, who I like more than Avery and Florimon (at least...I haven&#039;t really thought about rankings, and I&#039;m anything but qualified to deliver a scouting report).

He&#039;s got a lot of work to do, particularly in cutting down on the strikeouts, but I like his walking ability and power potential - even though he&#039;s had some crazy BABiPs in his first couple of years of pro ball.

Anyway, like I said, I like him even though he&#039;s nowhere close, and he doesn&#039;t get a lot of press, so I&#039;m just curious if entered into mind while you were paring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just interested in your thoughts (or lack thereof) of Ronnie Welty, who I like more than Avery and Florimon (at least&#8230;I haven&#8217;t really thought about rankings, and I&#8217;m anything but qualified to deliver a scouting report).</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got a lot of work to do, particularly in cutting down on the strikeouts, but I like his walking ability and power potential &#8211; even though he&#8217;s had some crazy BABiPs in his first couple of years of pro ball.</p>
<p>Anyway, like I said, I like him even though he&#8217;s nowhere close, and he doesn&#8217;t get a lot of press, so I&#8217;m just curious if entered into mind while you were paring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
