Turning The O’s Into Instant Contenders
November 16th, 2009 | by Daniel Moroz |Some people would like to see the O’s really jump into the free agent market this off-season and make some big moves to get the team into contention as soon as next year. Can the team spend their way into the playoffs in 2010? Let’s take a really silly theoretical look.
First we need to know how many wins we need. If we assume a replacement level team would win about 44 games in the AL, and that it will take about 94 wins to make the playoffs, then the O’s need to assemble a roster worth about 50 Wins Above Replacement*.
* I’m assuming they sign people for only one year. That means they’ll need to pay extra, but loading up on big contract when raises for Markakis, Jones, Wieters, the pitchers, etc. will be coming in a few years would explode the payroll.
Being pretty generous, let’s break down the roster for next year thusly (with 2009 WAR in parentheses):
C: Matt Wieters: 3.5 (1.9) – A full season plus some improvement.
1B: Luke Scott: 2.0 (1.5) – If he can play first OK then that boost his value.
2B: Brian Roberts: 3.25 (3.4) – Have to assume at least a little aging.
3B: Ty Wigginton: 1.0 (-0.3) – Can’t be that bad again, right?
SS: Cesar Izturis: 1.25 (1.3) – Very small step down defensively?
LF: Felix Pie: 2.5 (1.4) – More playing time and no huge slump.
CF: Adam Jones: 3.5 (1.9) – Offense and Defense together.
RF: Nick Markakis: 4.0 (1.9) – Bounces back, both the walks and defensively.
DH: Nolan Reimold: 1.5 (1.0) – Full season.
Bench: 0 (somewhere around 0) – Seems fair.
SP: Jeremy Guthrie: 2.5 (1.1) – More ‘07-’08 than ‘09.
SP: Brian Matusz: 3.0 (0.8) – Keeps pitching well, but in more innings.
SP: Brad Bergesen: 2.5 (2.3) – Pitches a little worse, but more often.
SP: Chris Tillman: 1.0 (-0.1) – Takes a small step forward.
SP: David Hernandez: 0.5 (-0.8) – Takes a small step forward.
Other starters: 0 (somewhere around 0) – Seems fair.
Bullpen: 5.0 (less than 5) – No relief Ace, but some good pitchers.
Total: 37 WAR
That gets the O’s (being generous, mind you) to 81 wins. So that means they need about 13 more WAR.
If they sign Chone Figgins (5.9 WAR this year) to play third-base, tack on maybe 4.0 WAR and subtract about 1.0 since he would be taking Wigginton’s place*. That’s 40, so we need 10 more. Sign John Lackey (3.9 WAR in ‘09) to add another 4.0 WAR and bump David Hernandez from the rotation. That’s 43.5, leaving 6.5 left. Sign Jason Bay (3.4 WAR in ‘09) to DH – you can trade Reimold for prospects or something – adds 3.5 WAR for an upgrade of 2 WAR. That’s 45.5 – we’re still 4.5 short and are running out of places to improve. Take a chance on Rich Harden (1.8 WAR in ‘09) and assume his HR/FB rate comes down and he stays at least a little healthy for 3.5 WAR. That bumps Tillman, so we’re up to 48. Marco Scutaro (4.4 WAR in ‘09) over Izzy at short adds maybe 3.25 WAR to get to to the finish line.
* I realize that Wiggy would up the bench total then, but I’m trying to keep it simple.
So there you go. Assuming the O’s have to pay each guy 35% more than they’re “worth” in 2010 to get them to forgo multiple-year deals and actually come to Baltimore, and it would cost the team (value based on the WAR I assigned to them in parentheses):
Figgins: $24.3 M ($18.5 M)
Lackey: $24.3 M ($18.5 M)
Bay: $21.3 M ($15.8 M)
Harden: $21.3 M ($15.8 M)
Scutaro: $19.7 M ($14.6 M)
Total: $110.9 M*
* It might be fair to think that Lackey and maybe Figgins and Bay would be more expensive, though Harden and Scutaro would likely be cheaper. Still, it’s pretty crazy that it would cost $100+ M to upgrade from an already unlikely 81 wins to 94.
The O’s base payroll for next year should start out at around $45 M. So if the team more than triples its payroll to about $155 M – making it fairly likely the second highest in all of baseball – and everything goes pretty well (not absolute best-case scenario, but better than expected), then the team wold have a good chance of making the playoffs. They would give up a bunch of draft-picks to sign these guys, but should recoup many of them after the 2010 season.
I have to say that there’s absolutely no way this happens, but it would be pretty amazing (and hilarious). I imagine that with the low payroll this past year and a potentially low-ish payroll in 2011 once all these expensive guys leave – plus a potential boost for having a good team – such a plan is actually feasible*. One of the problems is, if you don’t get all of your guys you’re going to be spending a ton of money without actually getting all the way to your goal. It’s a super high risk, medium-to-high reward strategy, which sounds exactly like Andy MacPhail to me.
* I mean, if I understand quantum mechanics properly, then it’s certainly possible that I could walk right through a brick wall. So compared to that, yeah, the O’s could pull this plan off.
Tags: Adam Jones, Brad Bergesen, Brian Matusz, Brian Roberts, Cesar Izturis, Chris Tillman, David Hernandez, Felix Pie, Jason Bay, Jeremy Guthrie, John Lackey, Luke Scott, Marco Scutaro, Matt Wieters, Nick Markakis, Nolan Reimold, Rich Harden, Ty Wigginton














By Stacey on Nov 16, 2009
This is a great article, Daniel, and I think shows just why 2011 is a much more reasonable goal for contention than 2010.
By Ian Oland on Nov 16, 2009
This is the greatest article ever! And for somebody like me, who’s completely unrealistic and thinks this team is one or two guys away, it’s a trip back to reality. I’m glad I could be the inspiration for this article.
By Dempsey's Army on Nov 17, 2009
Well laid out. the only way the Orioles contend next season is if Matusz, Tillman, Reimold, Jones and Markakis ALL make quantum leaps next season. I mean, these hitters would have to all OPS north of .900 and Tillman and Matusz need to develop into front line starters from day 1.
I don’t think Lackey would be a crazy signing looking forward to 2011-2012…but that seems unlikely.
By Matt P on Nov 24, 2009
Considering that the Phillies had a WAR of 41.7(a 40.7 WAR the year before), the Dodgers had a 43.4 WAR, the Redsox had a 45 WAR(to be fair, they did have a 51.4 WAR in 2008 the only 50+ WAR I saw) and the Yankees had a 49.5 WAR last year, why do you think the Orioles would need a 50 WAR to just make the playoffs?
In comparison, last year the Orioles had a WAR of about 20. If they do improve the way you project and they made a trade for Josh Johnson(project him for a 6 WAR) and Dan Uggla(project him for 3 WAR at 3B), then this would put the Orioles at 44.5 WAR and if all goes well in position to compete with the Red Sox.
Also, if you’re an Oriole Homer, you could say that Markasis is likely to have a 6 WAR again like he did two years ago, you could say that Bergy will likely have a 3 or a 3.5 WAR as he’ll show some improvement and pitch more innings(he had a terrible start to the season), you could say that Luke Scott is a 3 WAR player as he’s playing a position where he finally has a good UZR and probably a few more things.
Don’t get me wrong, the Orioles probably can’t contend for a playoff spot in 2010. But it’s not as bleak as you make it look.
By Matt P on Nov 24, 2009
I looked at my numbers again and found out that they were wrong. That would make my whole comment incorrect.
By Daniel Moroz on Nov 24, 2009
Hey Matt, thanks for the comments.
FanGraphs – which is what I based the WAR off of – doesn’t adjust for the AL/NL disparity. A 40 WAR team in the AL won’t have as good of a record as a 40 WAR team in the NL, since the level of competition in the AL is higher. That’s why I started out at 44 wins for a replacement level team, instead of a higher number had it been an NL team.
While I could have given higher WAR numbers to several players, I wanted to stay within the bounds of reasonableness. I try not to be an “Orioles Homer”.
The general point was that they can’t buy their way to the top this offseason.